Fred Norton
Oakland
t: 510 874 1007
f: 510 874 1460
fnorton@bsfllp.com
| Download vCard |
Area of Practice
Education
New York University School of Law, J.D., magna cum laude, 1999; Order of the Coif; Senior Articles Editor, NYU Law Review
University of Dayton, B.A., cum laude, History, 1993
Clerkships
Hon. M. Blane Michael, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999-2000
Admissions
New York and California
United States Courts of Appeals: Ninth Circuit
United States District Courts: Central, Eastern, Northern, and Southern Districts of California
Mr. Norton’s representative matters include defense of a telecommunications technology company and its individual directors in fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims brought by the company senior managers and minority shareholders; representation of a high net worth individual in a securities fraud case against a major bank that resulted in the successful Second Circuit appeal, Caiola v. Citibank, N.A., 295 F.3d 312 (2d Cir. 2002) (redefining a “security” to include synthetic options); defense of a Fortune 100 manufacturing company in federal criminal investigations and civil litigation arising from alleged price-fixing; representation of plaintiff technology company in antitrust litigation alleging the defendant’s monopolization of markets for cell phone chipsets and technology; representation of plaintiff aerospace company in antitrust litigation against the two dominant firms for the provision of satellite launch services; defense of a large telecommunications company against monopolization claims brought in Texas state courts; representation of plaintiff class in an antitrust lawsuit brought against the two largest participants in the market for auction services for alleged price-fixing; representation of defendant technology company in a securities fraud class action; and representation of the daughter of a deceased billionaire in claims alleging misappropriation of trust assets, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. Mr. Norton has also represented a major telecommunications company in pre-merger review before the Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission.
In March 2006, Mr. Norton successfully defended a client in a three-week jury trial in California state court against claims of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract arising from the sale of a business. The verdict was a complete victory for the firm’s client, which was also awarded 100% of its attorneys’ fees.
Selected Publications
Assisted Reproduction and the Frustration of Genetic Affinity: Interest, Injury, and Damages, 74 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 793 (1999)
Related News
Firm Report: July 2008 (07.28.2008)
Firm Report: January 2008 (Volume III, Issue 1) (01.22.2008)
Firm Report: April 2007 (Vol. 2, Iss. 1) (04.01.2007)
Firm Report: July 2006 (Vol. 1, Iss. 2) (07.01.2006)





