Dominic is a partner specializing in international arbitration, international litigation and public international law disputes. Widely recognized as having a "highly distinguished practice", he is particularly commended for his expertise in natural resources, joint venture and shareholder issues within the energy and mining sectors.

Described as a "serious arbitration practitioner", Dominic has gained a deep expertise in disputes for oil companies with interests in Asia, Africa and in the Middle East including Iran. 

He sits as an arbitrator and has acted as counsel under the auspices of many of the main arbitral institutions, including the ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC, JCAA, CIETAC as well as in pure ad hoc and UNCITRAL references.

Many of Dominic’s cases have involved jurisdictional disputes concerning parallel proceedings before other arbitral tribunals and in national courts in the United States, England, and in offshore jurisdictions. In addition to his jurisdictional litigation experience, Dominic also undertakes substantive commercial litigation in the English courts and has experience of a wide range of Asian court litigation, including in Japan and Singapore.

Dominic also focuses on international sovereignty and Law of the Sea disputes, in relation to which the leading legal directories describe him as being "sought out by governments to advise them on politically sensitive inter-state disputes". He is also “particularly recommended for bilateral investment treaty disputes, especially in the energy sector".

Since 2005, Dominic has been ranked by Asia Pacific Legal 500 as a leading individual in dispute resolution and has been specifically recognized by Chambers Global, since 2007, as a leading individual in public international law, international arbitration and international disputes. Following his return from Tokyo to London in November 2015, he enjoys rankings in Chambers UK for PIL and for international arbitration including investor State arbitration.

International arbitration

  • a consortium of investors in a multi-billion dollar LCIA arbitration, with parallel litigation in the BVI, revocation proceedings in the CIS and a criminal investigation arising over ownership of a stolen natural resources project
  • a leading oil company in relation to breach of contractual ad hoc arbitration claims and BIT claims on a multi-billion dollar development project in the Middle East affected by international sanctions
  • UNCITRAL arbitration under an investment agreement regarding a US$400 million claim against a government arising from a Middle East gas field development project
  • a major international oil company in parallel ICC arbitrations in Geneva and Paris

 Public international law

  • a South-Asian state in relation to its maritime boundary disputes with two neighbouring States, including negotiation of the state's maritime boundaries, UNCLOS Annex VII arbitration and an extended continental shelf submission.
  • the International Seabed Authority on its rights and responsibilities under UNCLOS.
  • a consortium of oil companies in relation to the termination of the CMATS treaty between Timor Leste and Australia.
  • a consortium of oil companies on its investments in South Sudan, including renegotiation of their rights, BIT and contractual claims following South Sudan's independence from Sudan in 2011.


  • A dual listed oil company in English High Court proceedings concerning a joint venture to acquire an upstream asset in West Africa
  • A space tourism company and its shareholders and officers in parallel litigation in Texas and the Isle of Man brought in breach of a settlement agreement
  • A Western bank in class action proceedings brought in Japan involving 19,000 individual claimants in relation to a failed investment scheme

The Continental Shelf, in the IMLI Manual on International Maritime Law, OUP 2014

Contemporary problems and paradoxes in international arbitration, ICCA Singapore, 2012

The rights (and wrongs) of capture: international law and the implications of the Guyana/Suriname arbitration Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 26, 374

A new dawn: investment arbitration and Japan JCAA Newsletter No 18

A brief review of the Japanese arbitration law, 1 AIAJ 2, 127 - 140

Elephants, experts and arbitrators: the decision in Inmarsat v APR and the return of the quasi-arbitrator Int ALR 191 – 195


  • College of Law, York; Law Society Final Examination
  • University of Cambridge, B.A., Modern and Medieval Languages with Law;

    Blundell Exhibition and Evan Lewis-Thomas Scholarship in Law


  • Solicitor of England & Wales